Appellate Advocacy at Vermont Law School
Leave this field empty

APPELLATE ADVOCACY PROGRAM

Judges' Information Pages


FALL 2021 CASES AND DATES


City of Austin v. Reagan Outdoor Advertising Co.

The sign code of the City of Austin, Texas treats on-premises signs (e.g., signs located on school or church property identifying the school or church) differently from off-premises signs (e.g., billboards). The former may be digitized, but the latter may not for reasons of aesthetics and traffic safety. Respondents, two outdoor advertising companies, challenged the on-premises/off-premises distinction as a content-based regulation that fails strict scrutiny, hence violates the First Amendment. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the advertisers. At issue in the Supreme Court is whether the city code's distinction between on- and off-premises signs is a facially unconstitutional content-based regulation under the Court's decision in a previous sign-regulation case, Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 135 S. Ct. 2218 (2015).


New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Corlett

In New York, state statute prohibits persons from carrying handguns outside the home for general self-defense. Rather, a person who wishes to carry a handgun outside the home must demonstrate "proper cause" for a carry permit, defined generally as a showing that the person has some special need for self-defense such as being the victim of previous violence that is likely to occur again. Petitioners were denied permits to carry handguns outside the home because they had no factual basis to support "proper cause" for such permits, they now challenge the "proper cause" requirement as a violation of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


United States v. Vaello-Madero

José Luis Vaello-Madero is a U.S. citizen. He was born in Puerto Rico and lived in New York from 1985 until 2013. In 2012, he became eligible for, and began receiving, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits due to a health condition. In 2013, he moved to Puerto Rico to help care for his ill wife. The government discontinued his SSI benefits because he was living "outside of the U.S." The question before the Court is whether providing SSI benefits to eligible individuals residing in the fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands, but not to eligible individuals residing in Puerto Rico, contravenes the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


Case Dates: 11/17, 11/18, 11/19, 11/22, 11/23, 11/30, 12/1, 12/2



Judges' Sign-up Form


Please enter your contact information and the dates and times you plan to judge on the form below. Each two-hour date/time block includes two arguments, for a total of four students.

Please contact Catherine Fregosi at cfregosi@vermontlaw.edu if you have questions or need more information.

(green background = required field)
Prefix:
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Availability: Yes, I'm available.
I am unable to judge, but please invite me next year.
Please remove me from your list.
Phone:
Date/Time Selection:
To select multiple cases or time slots, please hold down the control or command button while selecting.
Once a session is full, it will no longer appear in the list here.
Information Collection Disclosure:

The information you enter here is retained by VLS for internal use, and may be submitted to third-party tools or entities for specific, related purposes such as payment processing or reporting. All data is collected and retained via secure protocols. Click here to read relevant policy information.
European Union residents, click here to request removal of your data from our systems.

Please check this box to indicate that you understand the data retention policy information.